20th
June 2008
Israel carried out a major military
exercise earlier this month that American officials say
appeared to be a rehearsal for a potential bombing
attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Several
American officials said the Israeli exercise appeared to
be an effort to develop the military's capacity to carry
out long-range strikes and to demonstrate the
seriousness with which Israel views Iran's
nuclear program.
More than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15
fighters participated in the maneuvers, which were
carried out over the eastern Mediterranean and over
Greece during the first week of June, American
officials said.
The exercise also included Israeli
helicopters that could be used to rescue downed pilots.
The helicopters and refueling tankers flew more than 900
miles, which is about the same distance between Israel
and Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, American
officials said.
Israeli officials declined to discuss the
details of the exercise. A spokesman for the Israeli
military would say only that the country's air force
"regularly trains for various missions in order to
confront and meet the challenges posed by the threats
facing Israel."
But the scope of the Israeli exercise
virtually guaranteed that it would be noticed by
American and other foreign intelligence agencies. A
senior Pentagon official who has been briefed on the
exercise, and who spoke on condition of anonymity
because of the political delicacy of the matter, said
the exercise appeared to serve multiple purposes.
One Israeli goal, the Pentagon official
said, was to practice flight tactics, aerial refueling
and all other details of a possible strike against
Iran's nuclear installations and its long-range
conventional missiles.
A second, the official said, was to send
a clear message to the United States and other countries
that Israel was prepared to act militarily if diplomatic
efforts to stop Iran from producing bomb-grade uranium
continued to falter.
"They wanted us to know, they wanted the
Europeans to know, and they wanted the Iranians to
know," the Pentagon official said. "There's a lot of
signaling going on at different levels."
Several American officials said they did
not believe that the Israeli government had concluded
that it must attack Iran and did not think that such a
strike was imminent.
Shaul Mofaz, a former Israeli defense
minister who is now a deputy prime minister, warned in a
recent interview with the Israeli newspaper Yediot
Aharonot that Israel might have no choice but to attack.
"If Iran continues with its program for developing
nuclear weapons, we will attack," Mofaz said in the
interview published on June 6, the day after the
unpublicized exercise ended. "Attacking Iran, in order
to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable."
But Mofaz was criticized by other Israeli
politicians as seeking to enhance his own standing as
questions mount about whether the embattled Israeli
prime minister, Ehud Olmert, can hang on to power.
Israeli officials have told their
American counterparts that Mofaz's statement does not
represent official policy. But American officials were
also told that Israel had prepared plans for striking
nuclear targets in Iran and could carry them out
if needed.
Iran has shown signs that it is taking
the Israeli warnings seriously, by beefing up its air
defenses in recent weeks, including increasing air
patrols. In one instance, Iran scrambled F-4 jets to
double-check an Iraqi civilian flight from Baghdad
to Tehran.
"They are clearly nervous about this and
have their air defense on guard," a Bush administration
official said of the Iranians.
Any Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear
facilities would confront a number of challenges. Many
American experts say they believe that such an attack
could delay but not eliminate Iran's nuclear program.
Much of the program's infrastructure is buried under
earth and concrete and installed in long tunnels or
hallways, making precise targeting difficult. There is
also concern that not all of the facilities have been
detected. To inflict maximum damage, multiple attacks
might be necessary, which many analysts say is beyond
Israel's ability at this time.
But waiting also entails risks for the
Israelis. Israeli officials have repeatedly expressed
fears that Iran will soon master the technology it needs
to produce substantial quantities of highly enriched
uranium for nuclear weapons.
Iran is also taking steps to better
defend its nuclear facilities. Two sets of advance
Russian-made radar systems were recently delivered to
Iran. The radar will enhance Iran's ability to detect
planes flying at low altitude.
Mike McConnell, the director of national
intelligence, said in February that Iran was close to
acquiring Russian-produced SA-20 surface-to-air
missiles. American military officials said that the
deployment of such systems would hamper Israel's attack
planning, putting pressure on Israel to act before the
missiles are fielded.
For both the United States and Israel,
Iran's nuclear program has been a persistent worry. A
National Intelligence Estimate that was issued in
December by American intelligence agencies asserted that
Iran had suspended work on weapons design in late 2003.
The report stated that it was unclear if that work had
resumed. It also noted that Iran's work on uranium
enrichment and on missiles, two steps that Iran would
need to take to field a nuclear weapon, had continued.
In late May, the International Atomic
Energy Agency reported that Iran's suspected work on
nuclear matters was a "matter of serious concern" and
that the Iranians owed the agency
"substantial explanations."
Over the past three decades, Israel has
carried out two unilateral attacks against suspected
nuclear sites in the Middle East. In 1981, Israeli jets
conducted a raid against Iraq's nuclear plant at Osirak
after concluding that it was part of Saddam Hussein's
program to develop nuclear weapons. In September,
Israeli aircraft bombed a structure in Syria that
American officials said housed a nuclear reactor built
with the aid of North Korea.
The United States protested the Israeli
strike against Iraq in 1981, but its comments in recent
months have amounted to an implicit endorsement of the
Israeli strike in Syria.
Pentagon officials said that Israel's air
forces usually conducted a major early summer training
exercise, often flying over the Mediterranean or
training ranges in Turkey where they practice bombing
runs and aerial refueling. But the exercise this month
involved a larger number of aircraft than had been
previously observed, and included a lengthy combat
rescue mission.
Much of the planning appears to reflect a
commitment by Israel's military leaders to ensure that
its armed forces are adequately equipped and trained, an
imperative driven home by the difficulties the Israeli
military encountered in its Lebanon operation
against Hezbollah.
"They rehearse it, rehearse it and
rehearse it, so if they actually have to do it, they're
ready," the Pentagon official said. "They're not taking
any options off the table."