Legal validity is actually relative to the social details that represent the content material of the basic norm in each legal order. As an alternative of offering an explanation of what makes the presupposition of the authorized point of view rational, or what makes it rational to treat the requirements of legislation as binding necessities, Kelsen invitations us to stop asking.
In contrast, the procedural naturalism of Lon L. Fuller is a rejection of the conceptual naturalist idea that there are vital substantive moral constraints on the content material of legislation. The jurisprudence Kelsen propounded characterizes itself as a ‘pure’ idea of law as a result of it goals at cognition focused on the legislation alone” and this purity serves as its fundamental methodological principle” (PT1, 7).
But there may be another sort of pure law principle having to do with the connection of morality to law. The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has historically been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other programs of norms, equivalent to moral norms.
The interplay of those norms is then additional subject to representation as a static theory of law (Kelsen’s chapter 4) or as a dynamic concept of regulation (Kelsen’s chapter 5). The third operate is to clarify the systematic nature of authorized norms.