Slightly she claims solely that such discretion is essentially limited by moral norms: legal norms which can be promulgated by human beings are legitimate only if they are consistent with morality. Kelsen phrases the norm itself a ‘legal norm (Rechtsnorm)’ and its descriptive restatement a ‘legal proposition (Rechtssatz)’.
At this level, Kelsen admits, ‘one presupposes a new fundamental norm, no longer the fundamental norm delegating law making authority to the monarch, but a fundamental norm delegating authority to the revolutionary authorities’ (PT1, fifty nine). Kelsen insisted that, if social scientists wished to deal with legislation, they must take their idea of legislation from authorized science—that’s, from the Pure Principle of Law.
6 The static idea of law represents the regulation as a hierarchy of legal guidelines where the person legal guidelines are associated as being both superior or inferior the one to the other. Solely these created in accordance with the fundamental norm will be valid legal guidelines.
He calls that basic norm “the logical constitution.” It is the fundamental evaluative premise from which the legitimacy or validity of all the legal guidelines derive. The pure idea of regulation maintains that laws are norms handed down by the state.
With out that basic norm, we won’t get the legal “ought” from the sociological or historic “is.” There needs to be such a norm or justification would by no means come to an end. Our colloquia now range extensively over different areas of authorized idea, comparable to constitutional concept and the economic evaluation of regulation, and in all these areas our professors are producing trailblazing scholarship.